Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Identification of Standards for Pharmaceutical Care in Benin City

Patrick O Erah , James C Nwazuoke

Pharmacotherapy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria;

For correspondence:-  Patrick Erah   Email: patrick.erah@uniben.edu   Tel:+234 802 3360318

Published: 23 December 2002

Citation: Erah PO, Nwazuoke JC. Identification of Standards for Pharmaceutical Care in Benin City. Trop J Pharm Res 2002; 1(2):55-66 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v1i2.2

© 2002 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose:  Pharmaceutical  care  (PC)  is still  a  theoretical  statement  in  Nigeria and  not operational.  The goal  of this study  is  to  identify  practice  standards  that  can be effectively applied in the implementation of pharmaceutical care in Nigeria.
Method: The survey instrument  (a pre-tested self-administered questionnaire) was distributed to pharmacists  in  Benin  City.  Each questionnaire  contained  the 52  suggested practice standards  obtained  from  round one discussion by  the  Delphi  panel  of  PC  experts.  The pharmacists  were  requested  to  indicate  in  the questionnaire  whether  or  not  each of the standards  was  feasible,  relevant,  being  currently  applied or  intend  to be apply  it  in  their practice  setting.  Analysis  of the  responses  on  “being  currently  applied or  intend  to apply  it” excluded  the  pharmacists  in academia  since nearly  all  of them  were  full-time  University Lecturers. 
Result:  Of the 150  copies  of the  questionnaire  distributed,  119  (79.3%) responded.  The average proportion of  pharmacists who gave positive response to each of the standards were as  follows: feasibility  (71.3% ±  9.2%),  relevance  (72.0% ±  8.0%),  currently  apply  it  (18.2% ± 20.2%)  and intend to apply it  (10.8% ±  6.7%).  The 95% confidence intervals of the responses were: feasibility  (68.7%  –  73.9%),  relevance  (69.7%  -  74.4%),  currently  apply  it  (12.5%  -23.8%),  and  intend  to apply  it  (8.9%  -  12.6%).  Neither  the age,  years  of  professional experience,  qualification nor  area of  practice  significantly  influenced  the pharmacists responses.  Forty-seven  (47)  of the 52  standards  were  identified  for  application by  the pharmacists.
Conclusion:  PC  standards  that  can be effectively  applied  in  improving effective pharmaceutical  services  in  Benin  City  have been  identified.  The  identified 47  standards  are most  likely to stimulate the widespread implementation of PC in Nigeria if seriously addressed by  the  Pharmacists  Council  of  Nigeria, the  Pharmaceutical  Society  of  Nigeria and  Nigeria pharmacists.

Keywords: Benin City, pharmaceutical care, practice standards

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates